January 1, 2026

Case Study

How Chesmar Homes Achieved 621% ROI with Invoice Coding Automation

Chesmar Homes, a 4-division Texas homebuilder processing ~3,000 invoices monthly, was spending 100+ hours on manual invoice coding. Their AP team was stretched thin—and pressure to hire was mounting. Then they partnered with Actify Automations.

The Challenge

Chesmar Homes' AP team faced a familiar problem: too many invoices, not enough time.

  • ~3,000 invoices per month across 4 divisions (~10,000 processed to-date)

  • 1.5 minutes per invoice for manual coding (Job/Lot/CSI codes)

  • 100+ hours monthly spent on data entry

  • Growing backlog and pressure to hire additional AP staff

Each invoice required data extraction from PDFs, job/lot lookup, cost code selection, and ERP entry. The team was capable—but constrained by the manual nature of the work.

The Solution: Done-WITH-You Automation

Actify partnered directly with Chesmar's AP team to build a custom invoice coding automation—trained on their specific rules, not generic templates.

Phase

What Happened

Discovery (Week 1-2)

Analyzed 3 months of historical invoices, documented coding rules

Custom Build (Week 3-4)

AI models trained on Chesmar's specific data and cost codes

Shadow Mode (Week 5-6)

Ran in parallel with manual process, validated accuracy

Go-Live (Week 7+)

Transitioned to live processing with continuous optimization

The Results

Within the first month, the system delivered measurable impact:

Metric

Before

After

Change

Time per Invoice

1.5 min

~0 min (automated)

70% fully automated

Monthly Coding Hours

100+

~12

87.5% reduction

Straight-Through Processing

0%

70%

No human touch

ROI

621%

Validated

Monthly Value Generated

  • Time Savings: 88 hours × $32/hr = $2,816

  • Headcount Deferral: $5,400 (avoided hiring)

  • Late Fee Elimination: $1,200

  • Error Reduction: $800

  • Total Monthly Value: ~$10,200

What Changed

"We went from coding every invoice by hand to verifying AI-coded invoices. Our team focuses on exceptions now, not data entry."

— AP Team, Chesmar Homes

Before: AP team = data entry operators. Month-end = overtime and stress. Growth = hire more people.

After: AP team = exception handlers. Month-end = smoother close. Growth = scale without proportional hiring.

Why It Worked

  • Homebuilder-Specific: AI trained on Job/Lot/CSI codes, not generic templates

  • Partnership Model: Actify worked alongside the AP team, not just delivered software

  • Pilot Validation: Proved 70% STP before any long-term commitment

  • ERP Integration: Seamless export to existing systems

Is This a Fit for You?

This approach works best for:

  • Processing 500+ invoices/month

  • Spending significant time on manual coding

  • Using an ERP (Sage, JD Edwards, Viewpoint, etc.)

  • Planning for growth without proportional AP hiring

The Actify Guarantee: We prove 70% straight-through processing on YOUR invoices before you commit.